All the errors and fakery from “Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth)” that I can fit in.

Aug 10, 2024Channel
AI Analysis
Data from YouTube Data API v3Updated Just now
potholer54
potholer54

240K subscribers

View Channel

Video Overview

Video Details

PublishedAug 10, 2024
Duration37:07
Video IDHhAX42dT09w
Languageen-GB
CategoryScience & Technology
PrivacyPublic
Made for KidsNo
Video TypeRegular Video

Performance Metrics

Views114.4K
Likes6.7K
Comments6.2K
Engagement Rate11.34%
Likes per 100 views5.89
Comments per 1K views54.48

Description

TO SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL -- PLEASE SUPPORT THIS CHARITY: I don't ask for contributions. Instead, please support the work of Health in Harmony, which trades forest protections for health care. See my video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9-GRugP9pU for an explanation of their work. Donations can be made here: https://healthinharmony.org/donate-today/ Health in Harmony also has a live website: https://actnow.healthinharmony.org/ CORRECTIONS: 1) At around 15:00 I give the atmospheric content of CO2 as 32 billion. This is actually our annual contribution. The total is much higher, around 3,290 billion tonnes -- i.e. 3.3 trillion tonnes. 2) At 23:00 I say the rise in CO2 is shown in red. I should have said 'shown in blue.' Temperatures are shown red, CO2 blue. 3) The link between CO₂ and global temperature was first published in 1856 by Eunice Newton Foote, not Arrhenius. Arrhenius quantified it. 4) Spencer doesn't give a time period for the ‘natural air conditioning system’ he ‘feels' (yes, he does use the word 'feel') it will kick in some time and cool things down again. So I was wrong to say 'soon.' 5) Ljunqvist’s reconstruction was for NH temperatures, so I should not have added in _global_ temperatures and compared them to the medieval Warm Period. It's a shame I didn't spot this mistake sooner (my thanks to bacchusevokution for pointing it out), because the NH temperatures are higher still. 6) I said Tom Nelson and Tony Heller are directors of the CO2 Coalition. They are 'members.' SOURCES: If a source is missing, please ask in the comments section and I'll be happy to add it. Climate Change - The Movie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmfRG8-RHEI&t Carl Wunsch e-mail: http://ocean.mit.edu/~cwunsch/papersonline/channel4response Friis-Christensen complaint: https://web.archive.org/web/20070814011908/http://folk.uio.no/nathan/web/070427_statement.pdf Heat island effect: Transformation of Urban Surfaces and Heat Islands in Nanjing during 1984–2018 Li et al DOI:10.3390/su12166521 2020 "Assessment of Urban Versus Rural In Situ Surface Temperatures in the Contiguous United States: No Difference Found" Thomas C. Peterson 2003 "Climate: large-scale warming is not urban" -- David E Parker DOI: 10.1038/432290a "Urbanization effects in large-scale temperature records, with an emphasis on China" Jones et al 2008 Holocene reconstruction: A Reconstruction of Regional and Global Temperature for the Past 11,300 Years Marcott 2013 "Celestial driver of Phanerozoic climate?" -- N. Shaviv and J. Veizer, GSA Today, 2003 "Cloud Cover Feedback Moderates Fennoscandian Summer Temperature Changes Over the Past 1,000 Years" – Young et al., Geophysical Research Letters 2019 CO2 driving warming at the end of the last glaciation: 'Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic temperature changes across Termination III' - Caillon et al, 2003 'CO2 climate relationship as deduced from the Vostok ice core' - Barnola et al, 1990 A poster pointed out that a paper 'Earth’s radiative imbalance from the Last Glacial Maximum to the present' by Baggenstos et al (2019) does quantify the contributions of various forcings, and that the loss of albedo (reflectiveness from ice) is a greater contributor to deglaciation than CO2. Lindzen's failed prediction: https://skepticalscience.com/lindzen-illusion-2-lindzen-vs-hansen-1980s.html Please note: Lindzen didn't draw this graph himself, it comes from Skeptical Science based on Lindzen's 'Earth Iris' hypothesis. The text alongside the reconstruction reads: "I want to be explicit that these projections are my interpretation of Lindzen's comments, not Lindzen's own projections." "Observed Trends of Clouds and Precipitation (1983–2009): Implications for Their Cause(s)" – Zhong et al 2020 Matthew Wielicki publications and website https://matthewwielicki.com/publications Article about Wielicki's retirement: https://www.al.com/news/2023/01/professor-says-hes-quitting-university-of-alabama-amid-rise-of-illiberalism-dei-pushes-on-campuses.html\ GWPF links to oil money: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/may/04/climate-sceptic-thinktank-received-funding-from-fossil-fuel-interests My video on correlation between CO2 and global temperature https://youtu.be/FBF6F4Bi6Sg My video on Shaviv and Svensmark's hypothesis: Cosmic rays cause global warming https://youtu.be/vvztL9r47MI

Related Videos

More videos from potholer54