Why We Wanted to Retract Our Own Paper

Mar 30, 2026Channel
AI Analysis
Data from YouTube Data API v3Updated Just now

Video Overview

Video Details

Published2 months ago
Duration53:24
Video IDNLsmUDMMjPw
Languageen
CategoryScience & Technology
PrivacyPublic
Made for KidsNo
Video TypeRegular Video

Performance Metrics

Views13.5K
Likes807
Comments270
Engagement Rate7.99%
Likes per 100 views5.99
Comments per 1K views20.03

Description

For the written breakdown, see this letter: https://staycuriousmetabolism.substack.com/p/we-want-to-retract-our-own-paper?r=40ekz2 In this conversation, I sit down with my friend and colleague Dave Feldman to explain why we’re seeking to retract our own study. For context: on April 7th, 2025 we published results from a trial of ~100 individuals on low-carb diets whose LDL cholesterol dramatically increased—so-called “lean mass hyper-responders.” We set out to answer a critical question: does this group experience accelerated plaque progression, and what predicts that risk? Our original headline finding—that LDL cholesterol and ApoB did not predict plaque progression—still stands. However, the plaque progression data itself was based on an AI-guided analysis conducted by the company Cleerly. After publication, we discovered that their analysis was performed inappropriately (unblinded) with data suggesting errors or bias in the analysis. Unfortunately, the company declined to reanalyze or validate the work. Meanwhile, multiple independent, properly conducted analyses failed to replicate their findings. At that point, it became clear: we could no longer stand behind the original plaque progression results. Importantly, the updated evidence suggests this population may actually be at lower risk than initially implied by the initial anomalous Cleerly findings. In this discussion, we walk through exactly what happened—the data, the errors, and the decision to retract—with full transparency. For those who’ve followed this story, I hope this provides clarity, closure, and a glimpse of where the science goes next. Chapters: 0:31 — Why We Want the Paper Retracted 1:18 — How This Research Began 3:49 — The Study, the Patients, and the Core Finding 5:59 — Where the Results Started to Break Apart 12:29 — Why We Didn’t See the Full Data Before Publication 20:54 — The Raw Dataset Review 28:03 — The Independent Analyses That Changed Everything 41:04 — The Participant Reanalysis Plot Twist 49:43 — The Next Phase of the Research

Related Videos

More videos from Nick Norwitz MD PhD