AI Tuned My Car | Here’s What Went Wrong

Dec 22, 2025Channel
AI Analysis
Data from YouTube Data API v3Updated Just now

Video Overview

Video Details

Published6 months ago
Duration42:51
Video IDV0yocrHWUgw
Languageen-GB
CategoryAutos & Vehicles
PrivacyPublic
Made for KidsNo
Video TypeRegular Video

Performance Metrics

Views4.2K
Likes199
Comments72
Engagement Rate6.51%
Likes per 100 views4.78
Comments per 1K views17.30

Description

“Just use ChatGPT” is a comment we see almost daily when ECU tuning comes up, but is it actually viable? 🏎️ Building a fast car? Get $400 OFF the all-inclusive VIP online course package deal: https://hpcdmy.co/aivip 🦵Kickstart your EFI Tuning knowledge. Get 50% OFF your first online course: https://hpcdmy.co/aicanttune In this video, a professional tuner with over 20 years of real-world experience puts that idea to the test and finds out whether AI is genuinely a threat to his job. The brief is simple: generate the three core tables you would normally rely on to get a car up and running safely, volumetric efficiency (VE), target lambda, and ignition timing. Along the way, ChatGPT does show some strengths. It asks sensible setup questions, understands high-level engine behaviour, and can explain tuning concepts clearly when challenged. It also proves useful as a discussion tool when reviewing logs and thinking through possible changes. Where things start to unravel is in the details. Table breakpoints do not line up with the ECU, pressure axes are supplied in the wrong format, VE values are capped unrealistically low for a modern turbocharged four-valve engine, and target lambda under boost ends up leaner than most tuners would be comfortable with. Even when ignition timing lands close to a workable region, the overall shape and level of conservatism raise questions about how safe a true “base map” really is. The dyno testing makes the risks clear. Large closed-loop fuel trims are required just to keep the engine near target, and without them, the tune would be nowhere near safe. When a data log is fed back into ChatGPT for corrections, it initially struggles to interpret what is actually happening until significant context is provided. If you have ever wondered whether artificial intelligence can replace real calibration experience, this video shows exactly what happens when you put it in front of the software and the dyno. -------------------- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 - Will AI Replace Tuners? 0:45 - Can ChatGPT Tune A Haltech Elite 1:18 - Asking For A Base Map 2:45 - Our Car Setup 3:04 - ChatGPT’s Advice Is Sketchy 4:29 - Let's Get Started 5:00 - Voice Mode vs Text Mode Output 6:38 - The Three Tables That Matter Most 7:09 - The NSP File Claim And AI Hallucination 8:24 - VE Table In Excel | First Red Flags 9:06 - Why Low VE Numbers Can Run The Engine Lean 10:28 - MAP Axis Problems | Gauge vs Absolute 11:16 - Correct Breakpoints/Resolution 12:00 - Flipping The Load Axis For NSP 12:39 - Copy And Paste Into NSP | The Table Breaks 13:46 - First Start Problems 14:22 - VE Table Shape | This Is BAD 15:23 - The 90% VE Cap Argument Falls Apart 16:12 - Realistic Turbo VE Numbers 17:53 - Target Lambda Table Analysis 19:41 - Comparing Against 'Human' AFR Targets 21:39 - Pasting The AI Lambda Table | Still Not Happy 22:17 - GhatGPT's Base Ignition Table 25:02 - Did ChatGPT Get Base Ignition Timing Right? 27:21 - Dyno Test Begins | Watching Lambda And Fuel Trims 27:51 - Part Throttle Reality Check | Trims Are Working Hard 28:23 - Closed Loop Limits Hit | Still Lean 28:44 - Increasing Trim Authority To 25% 29:16 - Into Boost | 23% Trim To Hold Target 29:23 - Idle vs Cruise | Rich Here, Lean There 30:12 - Attempting A Ramp Run Anyway 30:54 - Dyno Plot Review | Power, Boost, Lambda 31:21 - Why Closed Loop Saved The Engine 32:08 - Log Review | Target vs Actual Lambda 32:39 - Peak Boost While Near Lambda 1 33:03 - Fuel Trim Pegged At 25% Through The Run 33:41 - Can ChatGPT Fix It From A Data Log? 34:10 - Exporting Haltech Logs To CSV 34:30 - Asking ChatGPT To Analyse The Ramp Run 35:07 - Missing Headers | Feeding The Correct Labels 35:28 - Wrong Corrections | Not Accounting For Closed Loop 36:14 - Adding Fuel Trim Channel And Clarifying Units 36:41 - ChatGPT Tries To Pull Fuel From A Lean Map 37:07 - Coaching The Model | The Penny Drops 37:36 - New VE Numbers | Now In The Ballpark 38:08 - The “Mount Everest” VE Table Problem 39:12 - Second Ramp Run With The AI Corrections 39:42 - Better In Places | Ugly In Others 40:01 - Data Log Review | Closer To Target 40:20 - Trims Still Working Hard 40:44 - Summary | All Three Tables Were Questionable 41:22 - The Real Risk For New Tuners 41:53 - Will This Change In 12 To 24 Months? 42:16 - AI Learns From The Internet | Mixed Quality Inputs 42:39 - Andre’s Verdict | Feeling Safe In The Job 42:44 - Learn To Tune Safely -------------------- FREE STUFF 🏆 Free Race Car Parts On Us | Enter the Giveaway https://hpcdmy.co/giveaway 🏎 Start Tuning With Confidence | EFI Fuel & Ignition Basics Lesson https://hpcdmy.co/EFI101y 💻 How to Tune Stock ECUs Safely | HP Tuners Fuel & Ignition Lesson https://hpcdmy.co/hptly 👕 Warning: May Cause Random Tech Chats at the Track: https://hpcdmy.co/merchy #highperformanceacademy #buildtunedrive #chatgpt #aituning #chatgpttune #4g63 #ecutuning #turbocharging #volumetricefficiency #lambdatarget #ignitiontiming #airfuelratio #efituning #haltech

Related Videos

More videos from High Performance Academy