When "Solutions" Make Things Worse
Jul 1, 2025•Channel
AI Analysis
Data from YouTube Data API v3•Updated Just now
Video Overview
Video Details
Published11 months ago
Duration5:24
Video IDVgDlVboDAtQ
Languageen
CategoryScience & Technology
PrivacyPublic
Made for KidsNo
Video TypeRegular Video
Performance Metrics
Views106.3K
Likes242
Comments25
Engagement Rate0.25%
Likes per 100 views0.23
Comments per 1K views0.24
Video Tags
#solutionism#tech can't fix everything#problems with technology#unintended consequences#dark side of tech#failed tech solutions#innovation gone wrong#silicon valley criticism#eric schmidt#google technology#bad tech fixes#tech solutionism#why tech fails#overengineering#technology explained#technology and society#ai ethics#startup culture#innovation#future of technology
Description
Ever tried to fix a problem, only to make it worse?
That’s the trap of solutionism – our tendency to apply solutions that worked in one context to places where they don’t.
Nowhere is this mindset more visible than in the world of tech. From finance to fashion, dieting to democracy, there’s hardly an area of life a Silicon Valley startup hasn’t tried to “fix” with an app or an algorithm.
The belief that “tech can solve everything” has led to real breakthroughs. But it’s also given us Wi-Fi-connected juicers and AI-enhanced smart fridges. While these are relatively harmless gimmicks, applying the same mindset to serious, complex problems – like climate, mental health, or politics – can have dangerous consequences.
So how can we tell if the next shiny fix is true progress – or just another case of solutionism waiting to backfire?
Find out in this video from iluli by Mike Lamb – explaining the ideas and innovations changing our lives.
*New videos on the 1st of every month. Don't forget to like and subscribe:* https://bit.ly/subscribe_to_iluli
*Visit the iluli website:* https://www.iluli.eu
_______
0:00 Introducing solutionism
0:36 Can tech really solve everything?
1:25 Solutions looking for problems
2:44 Example: Technology in policing
4:22 Conclusion: Solution or solutionism?