$1.5 Million For The Dumbest EV Charging System I’ve Seen | Auto Expert John Cadogan

Mar 21, 2026Channel
AI Analysis
Data from YouTube Data API v3Updated Just now

Video Overview

Video Details

Published2 months ago
Duration19:20
Video IDhmIaGVjayLg
Languageen
CategoryAutos & Vehicles
PrivacyPublic
Made for KidsNo
Video TypeRegular Video

Performance Metrics

Views42.6K
Likes2.4K
Comments552
Engagement Rate6.94%
Likes per 100 views5.65
Comments per 1K views12.95

Description

Olight Autumn sale ends midnight 27 March 2026 ArkPro: https://au.olight.com/s/EA4R2T Ostation 2 Pro:https://au.olight.com/s/IC314G Oclip Pro S:https://au.olight.com/s/VBENZJ Promo code for 10% off: AEJC10 This is what “the future” looks like when governments, green lobbyists and EV true believers get together with your wallet. At Sierra in Hawthorn, Melbourne, taxpayers helped fund a $1.5 million EV charging retrofit for an upscale apartment complex. The headline sounds impressive. The reality? A ceiling full of ordinary power points, a load-management system, and a setup that can only trickle charge a limited number of EVs at a time in rotating 10-minute intervals when demand is high. In other words: not proper charging infrastructure. More like a taxpayer-funded rationing system for rich apartment owners. In this report, I break down: • what was actually installed • why Level 1 charging is glacially slow • why this kind of system is no substitute for real infrastructure • what it says about the fantasy of large-scale apartment EV charging • and why the emissions argument is a lot shakier than the activists pretend Because when you strip away the press releases, the ministerial spin and the EV-suck media coverage, this looks a lot less like progress and a lot more like greenwashed theatre. If you like facts, engineering, and calling out public-policy idiocy when you see it, you’re in the right place.

Related Videos

More videos from Auto Expert John Cadogan